- 0 Talk
-
this wiki
Home
Welcome to Epicurus Principal Doctrines Commentary Epicurus Principle Doctrines form a useful guide to his thought. They are not always easy to relate to the modern world. Following a discussion on the Epicurean mailing list EPL, this wiki was formed to allow collaborative contributions to a commentary on the Principle Doctrines.
Translation used is from Project Gutenberg, so it is out of copyright. It is the translation of Robert Drew Hicks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Drew_Hicks
The idea really is to increase our understanding of Epicurus. In particular, to explore how his thought can be applied, practically, in the modern world. Also, to provide a critique where there may be areas of difficulty.
The intention is to use this wiki to produce a book on the Principle Doctrines. Collaborative contributions can be difficult to publish if copyright is defaulted. Consequently, all contributors agree to relinquish all copyright claims to material they provide on this wiki by contributing. However, all contributors who register their names on this wiki will be acknowledged in the book if it is ever published. With this exception, this wiki follows the copyright notice at the bottom of this page - that is the contents are covered by the CC-BY-SA. ==
Contributors
Edit
Epicurus Principle Doctrines - Robert Drew Hicks translation
Edit
General Comments relevant to all Doctrines
Edit
Doctrine 1 Why gods don't bother
Edit
Doctrine 2 Why death doesn't matter
Edit
Doctrine 3 Why pleasure is greater than pain
Edit
Doctrine 4 The limits of pain
Edit
Doctrine 5 Virtue for pleasure
Edit
Doctrine 6 Value of status and power - 1
Edit
Doctrine 7 Value of status and power - 2
Edit
Doctrine 8 Some pleasures too costly
Edit
Doctrine 9 Undifferentiated pleasure
Edit
Doctrine 10 Debauchery
Edit
Doctrine 11 Nature study
Edit
Doctrine 12 Myth prevents pleasure
Edit
Doctrine 13 Fear of phantoms
Edit
Doctrine 14 Value of power and wealth
Edit
Doctrine 15 Vanity
Edit
Doctrine 16 Chance
Edit
Doctrine 17 Unjust man
Edit
Doctrine 18 Mental pleasure
Edit
Doctrine 19 Time
Edit
Doctrine 20 Limits
Edit
Doctrine 21 Needs are easy
Edit
Doctrine 22 Sense and sensibility
Edit
Doctrine 23 Sensation as an absolute
Edit
Doctrine 24 Get it right
Edit
Doctrine 25 Keep it natural
Edit
Doctrine 26 Unnecessary desires
Edit
Doctrine 27 Primacy of friendship
Edit
Doctrine 28 Friendship as security
Edit
Doctrine 29 Types of desire
Edit
Doctrine 30 Unnecessary desire
Edit
Doctrine 31Natural Justice
Edit
Doctrine 32 Barbarians
Edit
Doctrine 33 Absolute justice
Edit
Doctrine 34 Why not be unjust -1
Edit
Doctrine 35 Why not be unjust -2
Edit
Doctrine 36 Absolute & Relative Justice
Edit
Doctrine 37 Test of Justice
Edit
Doctrine 38 Justice requires change
Edit
Doctrine 39 Tranquillity - Befriend, mollify or avoid if possible
Edit
Doctrine 40 On not being a smug bastard
Edit
Latest activity
Edit
-
Talk:Doctrine 5
new comment by FustbariclationComment: Epicurus makes a good point, I think that it's true that, if you're a normal person, you can't. Psychopaths are though, I think an exception. Whether... -
Talk:Doctrine 37
new comment by FustbariclationComment: In other words, it's perfectly possible for the requirements of justice to change and laws ought to be changed to reflect this. The test is whether... -
Talk:Doctrine 35
new comment by FustbariclationComment: It's true that he can't be sure, and we can only hope that this is true. There is, though, usually a statute of limitations after which it is... -
Talk:Doctrine 32
new comment by FustbariclationComment: Epicurus seems to be saying that contracts (covenants) are the basis for civilised behaviour, or, at least, the basis of justice. It seems to me that... -
Talk:Doctrine 12
new comment by FustbariclationComment: I think you make a good point. Rational fears, though, should remain - otherwise we'd go for evening strolls on the railway tracks, or indulge in the... -
Talk:Doctrine 1
new comment by FustbariclationComment: aphtharton means indestructible, imperishable - I understand. Wouldn't somebody, or something, that was actually 'imperishable' and/or... -
User talk:98.88.57.59
created by WikiaSummary: welcoming new contributor -
Talk:Doctrine 1
new comment by GaleniosComment: Epicurus did not write "eternal": the adjective aphtharton means indestructible, imperishable. -
Talk:Doctrine 6
new comment by FustbariclationComment: This is interestingly direct. 'any means whatever' - does that include having your own stockpile of nuclear weapons, electric fences, guns?? Or is... -
Talk:Contributors
new comment by A Wikia contributorComment: Ron Warrick - thank you for the suggestions for the names of the doctrines!